<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 55 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768141</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to its blacklisting by the respondents. The Court found the blacklisting justified due to repeated delays in fulfilling purchase orders and non-compliance with contractual timelines. The respondents followed due process by issuing show-cause notices and evaluating the petitioner&#039;s explanations. The writ petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 25,000 payable to the HC Services Committee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 55 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768141</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to its blacklisting by the respondents. The Court found the blacklisting justified due to repeated delays in fulfilling purchase orders and non-compliance with contractual timelines. The respondents followed due process by issuing show-cause notices and evaluating the petitioner&#039;s explanations. The writ petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 25,000 payable to the HC Services Committee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>