<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768147</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found, on the facts before it, that bail was warranted and that the order cancelling bail could not stand. It interfered with the cancellation order, restored the trial court&#039;s bail order, and directed that the original bail conditions continue to apply. The operative effect was that the appellant remained on bail subject to the conditions previously imposed by the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768147</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found, on the facts before it, that bail was warranted and that the order cancelling bail could not stand. It interfered with the cancellation order, restored the trial court&#039;s bail order, and directed that the original bail conditions continue to apply. The operative effect was that the appellant remained on bail subject to the conditions previously imposed by the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>