https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461347 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and does not permit a fresh appraisal of the merits or a new substantive basis for decision. The Court found that the impugned review order treated the matter as if the special appeal were being reheard, and in substance reversed the earlier appellate order by adopting a new position on payment of salary to teachers subject-wise. That amounted to rehearing and rewriting the appellate judgment, which lay beyond the limited scope of review. The review order was therefore beyond jurisdiction and could not stand. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:23:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461347 Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and does not permit a fresh appraisal of the merits or a new substantive basis for decision. The Court found that the impugned review order treated the matter as if the special appeal were being reheard, and in substance reversed the earlier appellate order by adopting a new position on payment of salary to teachers subject-wise. That amounted to rehearing and rewriting the appellate judgment, which lay beyond the limited scope of review. The review order was therefore beyond jurisdiction and could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461347