<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1535 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461348</link>
    <description>CCTV footage used as secondary electronic evidence was treated as inadmissible without the mandatory certificate, so it could not be relied on against the accused. The last-seen and chance-witness evidence was found unreliable because of delay, inconsistencies, and affected identification, and it did not complete the chain of circumstantial proof. The alleged extra-judicial confession was considered unsafe for want of confidence and corroboration, while the recoveries suffered from gaps in custody and procedure. On that reasoning, the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain excluding innocence, and the conviction and death sentence could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1535 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461348</link>
      <description>CCTV footage used as secondary electronic evidence was treated as inadmissible without the mandatory certificate, so it could not be relied on against the accused. The last-seen and chance-witness evidence was found unreliable because of delay, inconsistencies, and affected identification, and it did not complete the chain of circumstantial proof. The alleged extra-judicial confession was considered unsafe for want of confidence and corroboration, while the recoveries suffered from gaps in custody and procedure. On that reasoning, the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain excluding innocence, and the conviction and death sentence could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>