https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461350 Where an accused was not arrested during investigation and appears after cognizance pursuant to summons, a bond directed under Section 88 CrPC is an appearance bond and not a bail order. The Rajasthan HC held that such a direction does not place the accused in custody and therefore does not attract the bail restrictions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act or the cancellation power under Section 439(2) CrPC. As the impugned orders were consistent with the governing legal position, the applications seeking cancellation of the bond directions were rejected. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:22:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461350 Where an accused was not arrested during investigation and appears after cognizance pursuant to summons, a bond directed under Section 88 CrPC is an appearance bond and not a bail order. The Rajasthan HC held that such a direction does not place the accused in custody and therefore does not attract the bail restrictions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act or the cancellation power under Section 439(2) CrPC. As the impugned orders were consistent with the governing legal position, the applications seeking cancellation of the bond directions were rejected. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461350