https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768065 CESTAT Chennai held that appellant was not liable for service tax under reverse charge mechanism on services rendered outside India by foreign service provider. The tribunal followed its earlier decision in the same appellant's case for previous periods, ruling that services performed outside India fall under Rule 3(ii) exclusion. The service tax demand was rejected and appeal was allowed in appellant's favor. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:41:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768065 CESTAT Chennai held that appellant was not liable for service tax under reverse charge mechanism on services rendered outside India by foreign service provider. The tribunal followed its earlier decision in the same appellant's case for previous periods, ruling that services performed outside India fall under Rule 3(ii) exclusion. The service tax demand was rejected and appeal was allowed in appellant's favor. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768065