<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1455 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768069</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur held that where a director surrendered amounts found in diary as gross undisclosed income, only profit element should be added rather than full amount. The tribunal sustained addition of Rs. 10 lacs out of Rs. 1.35 crores, allowing expenditure claim on gross revenue. Regarding accounting method, the tribunal upheld assessee&#039;s consistent use of project completion method over percentage completion method, noting revenue&#039;s past acceptance and that immovable property transfers require complete consideration receipt and possession handover under Transfer of Property Act. The AO failed to justify departure from established practice between assessee and department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1455 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768069</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur held that where a director surrendered amounts found in diary as gross undisclosed income, only profit element should be added rather than full amount. The tribunal sustained addition of Rs. 10 lacs out of Rs. 1.35 crores, allowing expenditure claim on gross revenue. Regarding accounting method, the tribunal upheld assessee&#039;s consistent use of project completion method over percentage completion method, noting revenue&#039;s past acceptance and that immovable property transfers require complete consideration receipt and possession handover under Transfer of Property Act. The AO failed to justify departure from established practice between assessee and department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>