<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1469 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768083</link>
    <description>A GST demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act was found unsustainable because it did not record reasons or deal with the taxpayer&#039;s reply to the show cause notice. The order imposed tax, interest and penalty on brief assertions that the reply and documents were inadequate, but it failed to show genuine consideration of the response. Such a non-speaking order could not stand and was quashed, with liberty to the GST Officer to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1469 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768083</link>
      <description>A GST demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act was found unsustainable because it did not record reasons or deal with the taxpayer&#039;s reply to the show cause notice. The order imposed tax, interest and penalty on brief assertions that the reply and documents were inadequate, but it failed to show genuine consideration of the response. Such a non-speaking order could not stand and was quashed, with liberty to the GST Officer to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>