<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2174 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461331</link>
    <description>At the cognizance stage, the Court treated non-bailable warrants as too coercive and allowed a lesser process. It accepted the request to modify the summoning order by converting the non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants, reflecting that the initial stage warranted more proportionate coercive measures. The petitioners therefore obtained relief through substitution of the warrant process with bailable warrants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 17:04:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2174 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461331</link>
      <description>At the cognizance stage, the Court treated non-bailable warrants as too coercive and allowed a lesser process. It accepted the request to modify the summoning order by converting the non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants, reflecting that the initial stage warranted more proportionate coercive measures. The petitioners therefore obtained relief through substitution of the warrant process with bailable warrants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>