<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1540 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461341</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged a show cause notice proposing recovery of duty drawback on exported mobile phones and sought interim protection against the proposed adjudication. Notice was issued in the writ proceedings, and the adjudication of the show cause notice was allowed to continue. The court directed that the adjudication be undertaken uninfluenced by the impugned clarification, preserving the matter for independent consideration on the notice itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 17:04:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1540 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461341</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged a show cause notice proposing recovery of duty drawback on exported mobile phones and sought interim protection against the proposed adjudication. Notice was issued in the writ proceedings, and the adjudication of the show cause notice was allowed to continue. The court directed that the adjudication be undertaken uninfluenced by the impugned clarification, preserving the matter for independent consideration on the notice itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>