<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42498</link>
    <description>Dip solution used in tyre manufacture was held not to be an artificial or synthetic resin under Tariff Item No. 15A(1), and on the evidence it was also not a marketable commodity. Because marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability, a product that is not known to the market as goods is not liable to excise duty merely by falling within a tariff description. The dip solution was therefore not exigible to excise duty, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:01:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 83 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42498</link>
      <description>Dip solution used in tyre manufacture was held not to be an artificial or synthetic resin under Tariff Item No. 15A(1), and on the evidence it was also not a marketable commodity. Because marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability, a product that is not known to the market as goods is not liable to excise duty merely by falling within a tariff description. The dip solution was therefore not exigible to excise duty, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>