<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768015</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside service tax demands under both business auxiliary services and GTA categories. The tribunal held that wire drawing from wire rod constitutes manufacturing, excluding it from business auxiliary services definition under Section 65(19). For GTA services, liability arises only when receiving services from agencies issuing consignment notes under Section 65(50b). Since local transporters hired by appellant did not issue consignment notes, they were not goods transport agencies, making service tax inapplicable under reverse charge mechanism. Consequently, interest and penalty demands were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768015</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside service tax demands under both business auxiliary services and GTA categories. The tribunal held that wire drawing from wire rod constitutes manufacturing, excluding it from business auxiliary services definition under Section 65(19). For GTA services, liability arises only when receiving services from agencies issuing consignment notes under Section 65(50b). Since local transporters hired by appellant did not issue consignment notes, they were not goods transport agencies, making service tax inapplicable under reverse charge mechanism. Consequently, interest and penalty demands were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>