https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768021 The HC directed the CBIC Drawback Division to reconsider the Petitioner's duty drawback applications, emphasizing the need for a reasoned order. The Court found that the clean energy cess should be included in the brand rate calculation per Instruction No. 4/2019, applicable to pending applications. It criticized the CBIC's cryptic rejection of the applications and highlighted the potential for relaxing the limitation period under Rule 17. The HC ordered the CBIC to decide within three months, allowing the Petitioner to pursue further legal remedies. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:21:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768021 The HC directed the CBIC Drawback Division to reconsider the Petitioner's duty drawback applications, emphasizing the need for a reasoned order. The Court found that the clean energy cess should be included in the brand rate calculation per Instruction No. 4/2019, applicable to pending applications. It criticized the CBIC's cryptic rejection of the applications and highlighted the potential for relaxing the limitation period under Rule 17. The HC ordered the CBIC to decide within three months, allowing the Petitioner to pursue further legal remedies. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768021