<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1415 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768029</link>
    <description>ITAT Amritsar allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on transfer pricing adjustments for power and steam transactions, ruling that the assessee&#039;s arm&#039;s length pricing methods were correct and the AO&#039;s adjustments were unjustified. The tribunal held that power prices determined by state regulations cannot be considered market value under Section 80-IA(8), and the AO erred in steam pricing methodology. However, the tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for Section 80G deduction on CSR contributions, stating it would defeat CSR requirements. The appeal regarding deemed income under Section 41(1) was allowed to prevent double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1415 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768029</link>
      <description>ITAT Amritsar allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on transfer pricing adjustments for power and steam transactions, ruling that the assessee&#039;s arm&#039;s length pricing methods were correct and the AO&#039;s adjustments were unjustified. The tribunal held that power prices determined by state regulations cannot be considered market value under Section 80-IA(8), and the AO erred in steam pricing methodology. However, the tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s claim for Section 80G deduction on CSR contributions, stating it would defeat CSR requirements. The appeal regarding deemed income under Section 41(1) was allowed to prevent double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>