<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1420 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768034</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled on transfer pricing adjustments regarding comparable selection for BPO services. The tribunal excluded Cosmic Global as it failed the 75% export sales filter with 0% export revenue from BPO services, and rejected Eclerx Services for functional dissimilarity while including TCS e-Serve as functionally comparable. The tribunal directed foreign exchange gains be treated as operating income rather than non-operating, finding such gains directly related to ITES revenue from associated enterprises. ICRA Online was retained as comparable meeting the 87% export earnings threshold, while Motif India Infotech was included due to insufficient grounds for rejection by TPO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1420 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768034</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled on transfer pricing adjustments regarding comparable selection for BPO services. The tribunal excluded Cosmic Global as it failed the 75% export sales filter with 0% export revenue from BPO services, and rejected Eclerx Services for functional dissimilarity while including TCS e-Serve as functionally comparable. The tribunal directed foreign exchange gains be treated as operating income rather than non-operating, finding such gains directly related to ITES revenue from associated enterprises. ICRA Online was retained as comparable meeting the 87% export earnings threshold, while Motif India Infotech was included due to insufficient grounds for rejection by TPO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>