<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768040</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The tribunal upheld validity of assessment order despite lack of recorded reasons for TPO referral, following Aztec Software precedent. However, ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s grounds on intra-group services and mark-up on fixed asset purchases, directing deletion of ALP adjustments as no material distinguishing features existed compared to previous year&#039;s favorable decision. For royalty payments, ITAT rejected Department&#039;s appeal, citing EKL Appliances precedent against need-benefit test and Magneti Marelli ruling preventing segregation of aggregated transactions benchmarked under TNMM.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=810238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1426 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768040</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The tribunal upheld validity of assessment order despite lack of recorded reasons for TPO referral, following Aztec Software precedent. However, ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s grounds on intra-group services and mark-up on fixed asset purchases, directing deletion of ALP adjustments as no material distinguishing features existed compared to previous year&#039;s favorable decision. For royalty payments, ITAT rejected Department&#039;s appeal, citing EKL Appliances precedent against need-benefit test and Magneti Marelli ruling preventing segregation of aggregated transactions benchmarked under TNMM.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>