<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42487</link>
    <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act confers an independent power to summon persons for inquiry into smuggling, and that power is not confined to the stage after a Section 124 notice. A person examined under Section 108 has no right, as of course, to insist on the presence of counsel during interrogation because the inquiry is investigative rather than adversarial. A witness cannot be compelled to write down his own statement, although the Customs Officer may question the witness and record the answers. The summons-based customs inquiry was sustained, while the mode of recording statements was clarified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42487</link>
      <description>Section 108 of the Customs Act confers an independent power to summon persons for inquiry into smuggling, and that power is not confined to the stage after a Section 124 notice. A person examined under Section 108 has no right, as of course, to insist on the presence of counsel during interrogation because the inquiry is investigative rather than adversarial. A witness cannot be compelled to write down his own statement, although the Customs Officer may question the witness and record the answers. The summons-based customs inquiry was sustained, while the mode of recording statements was clarified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>