https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42476 The Supreme Court upheld the differential treatment in customs duty rates between private importers and the State Trading Corporation, stating that the reasons provided in the exemption orders were reasonable. The Court found that the differential treatment was justified based on policy considerations to maintain reasonable domestic vanaspati prices and prevent unauthorized diversion of edible oils. The Court held that the private importers were not entitled to relief, dismissing their appeals and writ petitions. en-us Wed, 17 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 May 2015 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42476 The Supreme Court upheld the differential treatment in customs duty rates between private importers and the State Trading Corporation, stating that the reasons provided in the exemption orders were reasonable. The Court found that the differential treatment was justified based on policy considerations to maintain reasonable domestic vanaspati prices and prevent unauthorized diversion of edible oils. The Court held that the private importers were not entitled to relief, dismissing their appeals and writ petitions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 17 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42476