<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42473</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order for not being in accordance with the law and failing to pass proper judgment. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal, dispose of it on merits without insisting on further deposit, and emphasized expeditious handling of the case. The original petition was allowed with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:09:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42473</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order for not being in accordance with the law and failing to pass proper judgment. The Court directed the Tribunal to restore the appeal, dispose of it on merits without insisting on further deposit, and emphasized expeditious handling of the case. The original petition was allowed with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>