<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42472</link>
    <description>The appellate authority had not finally adjudicated the refund claim or granted refund on merits; it had only directed collection of original records and further examination of whether a refund case existed. Any observation that the petitioner&#039;s deposition might be accepted did not amount to a favourable determination. Because the refund dispute remained unsettled and no final order had been made, the writ petition was premature and not maintainable at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 76 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42472</link>
      <description>The appellate authority had not finally adjudicated the refund claim or granted refund on merits; it had only directed collection of original records and further examination of whether a refund case existed. Any observation that the petitioner&#039;s deposition might be accepted did not amount to a favourable determination. Because the refund dispute remained unsettled and no final order had been made, the writ petition was premature and not maintainable at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>