<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42467</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Government&#039;s order and allowing the writ appeal. The Court emphasized that the imported machinery, primarily intended for making boots and shoes, should be classified under Tariff Item 72(15) for duty assessment, rejecting the Government&#039;s contention that the machinery&#039;s capability to make other footwear types excluded it from this classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42467</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Government&#039;s order and allowing the writ appeal. The Court emphasized that the imported machinery, primarily intended for making boots and shoes, should be classified under Tariff Item 72(15) for duty assessment, rejecting the Government&#039;s contention that the machinery&#039;s capability to make other footwear types excluded it from this classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>