<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1348 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767962</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Allahabad ruled that service tax cannot be charged merely on invoice issuance without actual service completion. The appellant provided real estate agent services, but due to business closure of the client company, actual sale/purchase transactions could not occur. The tribunal held that invoices issued before service completion cannot be treated as proper invoices under Rule 4(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994. Since no actual real estate transactions took place, service tax was not chargeable despite invoice issuance. Consequently, penalties were also deemed improper and unwarranted. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1348 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767962</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Allahabad ruled that service tax cannot be charged merely on invoice issuance without actual service completion. The appellant provided real estate agent services, but due to business closure of the client company, actual sale/purchase transactions could not occur. The tribunal held that invoices issued before service completion cannot be treated as proper invoices under Rule 4(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994. Since no actual real estate transactions took place, service tax was not chargeable despite invoice issuance. Consequently, penalties were also deemed improper and unwarranted. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>