https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767970 Delhi HC held that revival of struck off company was invalid. Under Section 252 second proviso of Companies Act 2013, Registrar must file application before NCLT within three years of dissolution order for restoration based on inadvertent striking or incorrect information. Respondent failed to follow statutory procedure and three-year limitation period from 2016 dissolution order had expired. Court directed Registrar to strike off company name from register and follow proper legal procedures. Petition allowed. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:31:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767970 Delhi HC held that revival of struck off company was invalid. Under Section 252 second proviso of Companies Act 2013, Registrar must file application before NCLT within three years of dissolution order for restoration based on inadvertent striking or incorrect information. Respondent failed to follow statutory procedure and three-year limitation period from 2016 dissolution order had expired. Court directed Registrar to strike off company name from register and follow proper legal procedures. Petition allowed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767970