<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768000</link>
    <description>Delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition was condoned, allowing the petition to be restored. The restored petition was then permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue the alternative appeal remedy. The operative effect was to revive the writ proceedings for procedural purposes, while preserving the party&#039;s ability to seek relief through the appeal route instead of continuing in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768000</link>
      <description>Delay in seeking restoration of a writ petition was condoned, allowing the petition to be restored. The restored petition was then permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue the alternative appeal remedy. The operative effect was to revive the writ proceedings for procedural purposes, while preserving the party&#039;s ability to seek relief through the appeal route instead of continuing in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>