<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1389 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768003</link>
    <description>GST registration cancellation was challenged on the ground that the petitioner had cleared all dues after the interim order and had continued to deposit GST regularly every month. On that compliance basis, the cancellation order was treated as no longer requiring further enforcement, and the interim protection was continued. The cancellation order was set aside and the interim order was made absolute in favour of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1389 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768003</link>
      <description>GST registration cancellation was challenged on the ground that the petitioner had cleared all dues after the interim order and had continued to deposit GST regularly every month. On that compliance basis, the cancellation order was treated as no longer requiring further enforcement, and the interim protection was continued. The cancellation order was set aside and the interim order was made absolute in favour of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>