https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768005 HC held that the assessment and rectification orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner had responded to initial and subsequent ASMT-10 notices and sought adjournments, filing of a detailed reply with documents, and a personal hearing. Despite this, the authority proceeded to confirm the demand without affording sufficient opportunity of hearing. HC ruled that, if the authority wished to confirm the demand, a proper hearing was mandatory. Accordingly, HC set aside the assessment and rectification orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768005 HC held that the assessment and rectification orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner had responded to initial and subsequent ASMT-10 notices and sought adjournments, filing of a detailed reply with documents, and a personal hearing. Despite this, the authority proceeded to confirm the demand without affording sufficient opportunity of hearing. HC ruled that, if the authority wished to confirm the demand, a proper hearing was mandatory. Accordingly, HC set aside the assessment and rectification orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. Case-Laws GST Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768005