<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1394 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768008</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the order cancelling bail could not be sustained on the facts before it. Finding that a case for bail had been made out, it set aside the cancellation order and restored the trial court&#039;s bail order. The original bail conditions were directed to continue to apply to the appellant, and the earlier grant of bail was reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1394 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768008</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the order cancelling bail could not be sustained on the facts before it. Finding that a case for bail had been made out, it set aside the cancellation order and restored the trial court&#039;s bail order. The original bail conditions were directed to continue to apply to the appellant, and the earlier grant of bail was reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>