https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42458 Only one proposed issue was found to be a genuine question of law arising from the reference application, so the High Court confined the reference to that issue and reframed it to focus on the permissible period for initiating proceedings under Section 11A. It directed the Tribunal to draw up the statement of facts on the reframed question and transmit the case to the Court. The application thus succeeded to the extent that a legal question was identified and referred in narrowed form. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:15:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42458 Only one proposed issue was found to be a genuine question of law arising from the reference application, so the High Court confined the reference to that issue and reframed it to focus on the permissible period for initiating proceedings under Section 11A. It directed the Tribunal to draw up the statement of facts on the reframed question and transmit the case to the Court. The application thus succeeded to the extent that a legal question was identified and referred in narrowed form. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42458