https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461304 Review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds recognised under Section 151 and Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including discovery of new material, patent error, or similar sufficient reason. An objection based on alleged lack of notice and breach of natural justice does not sustain review unless prejudice is shown. Reference to judgments not cited at hearing does not by itself establish an error apparent, and a claimed failure to follow precedent is not reviewable where the earlier court distinguished the precedent on facts or law. The note also explains that justiciability of dearness allowance was treated as decided where the earlier reasoning recognised it as an enforceable entitlement. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2026 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461304 Review jurisdiction is confined to the narrow grounds recognised under Section 151 and Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including discovery of new material, patent error, or similar sufficient reason. An objection based on alleged lack of notice and breach of natural justice does not sustain review unless prejudice is shown. Reference to judgments not cited at hearing does not by itself establish an error apparent, and a claimed failure to follow precedent is not reviewable where the earlier court distinguished the precedent on facts or law. The note also explains that justiciability of dearness allowance was treated as decided where the earlier reasoning recognised it as an enforceable entitlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461304