https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461305 A review challenge to a remand order remains maintainable even if the remand has already been acted upon and subsequent proceedings have taken place, because the Code of Civil Procedure contains no express or implied bar extinguishing review on that basis. However, review jurisdiction under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 is narrow and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. Where the remand was made because the earlier injunction order lacked essential findings and no error apparent or other review ground was shown, the remand order is not liable to be recalled. The challenge therefore fails, while the parties may pursue remedies in the pending appeal. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:57:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461305 A review challenge to a remand order remains maintainable even if the remand has already been acted upon and subsequent proceedings have taken place, because the Code of Civil Procedure contains no express or implied bar extinguishing review on that basis. However, review jurisdiction under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 is narrow and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. Where the remand was made because the earlier injunction order lacked essential findings and no error apparent or other review ground was shown, the remand order is not liable to be recalled. The challenge therefore fails, while the parties may pursue remedies in the pending appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461305