https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461306 Review under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC cannot be used to correct an allegedly erroneous decision on merits or to reargue material already considered; it is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record or other recognised grounds. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had exceeded review jurisdiction by treating the review as an appeal, so the review order was unsustainable. As the dismissal of the connected writ petitions and contempt petition followed that review order, those consequential orders were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration on their own merits, and the earlier writ order was restored. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:57:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461306 Review under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC cannot be used to correct an allegedly erroneous decision on merits or to reargue material already considered; it is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record or other recognised grounds. The Supreme Court held that the High Court had exceeded review jurisdiction by treating the review as an appeal, so the review order was unsustainable. As the dismissal of the connected writ petitions and contempt petition followed that review order, those consequential orders were set aside and remitted for fresh consideration on their own merits, and the earlier writ order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461306