https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461308 Kerala HC dismissed petitioner's writ petition challenging dealership termination proceedings. Court held petition maintainable under Article 226 due to alleged natural justice violations against state instrumentality. However, HC found no procedural unfairness, ruling the hearing process was institutional rather than personal, where strict application of "he who decides must hear" rule doesn't apply. Court noted detailed hearing procedure was followed and termination order properly issued by Corporation through designated officials. Petition dismissed as no natural justice violation established. en-us Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:27:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461308 Kerala HC dismissed petitioner's writ petition challenging dealership termination proceedings. Court held petition maintainable under Article 226 due to alleged natural justice violations against state instrumentality. However, HC found no procedural unfairness, ruling the hearing process was institutional rather than personal, where strict application of "he who decides must hear" rule doesn't apply. Court noted detailed hearing procedure was followed and termination order properly issued by Corporation through designated officials. Petition dismissed as no natural justice violation established. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Tue, 12 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461308