<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Oppn flags &#039;denial of speaking opportunity&#039; to LoP, &#039;politicisation&#039; of speaker&#039;s remarks</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38875</link>
    <description>Opposition leaders protested the denial of a speaking opportunity to the Leader of Opposition and criticised the politicisation of the Speaker&#039;s remarks, arguing that the LoP was not allowed to speak despite being called and that the Speaker&#039;s admonition lacked a clear trigger. They raised wider institutional concerns: the prolonged vacancy of the deputy speaker post contrary to the constitutional mandate, unilateral scheduling of government business without opposition consultation, neglect of adjournment motions, curtailed time for private members&#039; business, exclusion of key ministries from Budget debates, and practical impediments such as microphones being switched off and targeted broadcast camera angles, urging corrective action to restore parliamentary norms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Oppn flags &#039;denial of speaking opportunity&#039; to LoP, &#039;politicisation&#039; of speaker&#039;s remarks</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38875</link>
      <description>Opposition leaders protested the denial of a speaking opportunity to the Leader of Opposition and criticised the politicisation of the Speaker&#039;s remarks, arguing that the LoP was not allowed to speak despite being called and that the Speaker&#039;s admonition lacked a clear trigger. They raised wider institutional concerns: the prolonged vacancy of the deputy speaker post contrary to the constitutional mandate, unilateral scheduling of government business without opposition consultation, neglect of adjournment motions, curtailed time for private members&#039; business, exclusion of key ministries from Budget debates, and practical impediments such as microphones being switched off and targeted broadcast camera angles, urging corrective action to restore parliamentary norms.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:46:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>