<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 133 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42444</link>
    <description>The court canceled anticipatory bail for one respondent due to a direct link to seized contraband worth nearly three crores, ordering custody for further investigation. The other respondent was granted bail with stricter conditions, highlighting the importance of unbiased scrutiny in cases involving significant economic implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 133 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42444</link>
      <description>The court canceled anticipatory bail for one respondent due to a direct link to seized contraband worth nearly three crores, ordering custody for further investigation. The other respondent was granted bail with stricter conditions, highlighting the importance of unbiased scrutiny in cases involving significant economic implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>