<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42439</link>
    <description>Separate processing units may be treated as one factory for central excise where the factual arrangement shows common control, shared premises, integrated processing, and use of one unit&#039;s facilities by the other. The exemption under Notification No. 253/82 depended on the specified processes being carried out in the same factory, so a split structure engineered to separate bleaching, mercerising, calendering and stentering could be disregarded if it was only a facade. On those facts, the excise authority could examine the arrangement, treat the units as a single manufacturing unit, and insist on the appropriate licensing consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:34:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 118 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42439</link>
      <description>Separate processing units may be treated as one factory for central excise where the factual arrangement shows common control, shared premises, integrated processing, and use of one unit&#039;s facilities by the other. The exemption under Notification No. 253/82 depended on the specified processes being carried out in the same factory, so a split structure engineered to separate bleaching, mercerising, calendering and stentering could be disregarded if it was only a facade. On those facts, the excise authority could examine the arrangement, treat the units as a single manufacturing unit, and insist on the appropriate licensing consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>