<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITC Must Be Reversed on Inputs Used for Goods Later Destroyed in Fire Under Section 17(5) of SGST Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86906</link>
    <description>The AAAR held that a registered person must reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed on inputs used to manufacture steel nails that were subsequently destroyed in a fire accident. While Section 16 of SGST Act, 2017 generally allows ITC on inputs used in furtherance of business, Section 17(5) specifically prohibits ITC on goods that are &quot;lost, stolen, destroyed or written off.&quot; The AAAR emphasized that Section 17(5) contains a non-obstante clause giving it overriding effect over Section 16(1) and Section 18(1). Therefore, despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding Section 16(1), the AAAR upheld the original Advance Ruling, requiring the appellant to reverse ITC on inputs used in manufacturing the destroyed finished goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:37:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITC Must Be Reversed on Inputs Used for Goods Later Destroyed in Fire Under Section 17(5) of SGST Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86906</link>
      <description>The AAAR held that a registered person must reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed on inputs used to manufacture steel nails that were subsequently destroyed in a fire accident. While Section 16 of SGST Act, 2017 generally allows ITC on inputs used in furtherance of business, Section 17(5) specifically prohibits ITC on goods that are &quot;lost, stolen, destroyed or written off.&quot; The AAAR emphasized that Section 17(5) contains a non-obstante clause giving it overriding effect over Section 16(1) and Section 18(1). Therefore, despite the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding Section 16(1), the AAAR upheld the original Advance Ruling, requiring the appellant to reverse ITC on inputs used in manufacturing the destroyed finished goods.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:37:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>