<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1319 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities were correctly classified as &#039;works contract service&#039; and thus not liable for service tax under &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Services&#039; for the period before 01.06.2007, aligning with the SC&#039;s decision in Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal, and found the demand for the period after 01.06.2007 unsustainable as the appellant had paid the due amount under the correct classification. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was also deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence of suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1319 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities were correctly classified as &#039;works contract service&#039; and thus not liable for service tax under &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Services&#039; for the period before 01.06.2007, aligning with the SC&#039;s decision in Larsen &amp;amp; Toubro Ltd. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal, and found the demand for the period after 01.06.2007 unsustainable as the appellant had paid the due amount under the correct classification. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was also deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence of suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>