<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of Unutilized ITC Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Payments Were Remitted to Different Branch&#039;s Bank Account</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86889</link>
    <description>The HC quashed an order denying refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit for FY 2022-23 and Q1 of FY 2023-24. The respondent had rejected the refund claim because payments for exported services by petitioner&#039;s Delhi branch office were remitted to a bank account in Bangalore. Relying on Cable and Wireless Global India Private Limited, the Court held that mapping a Bangalore bank account after receiving remittances validates that services were exported by the Delhi branch office. The Court found the respondent&#039;s objection overly technical and unsustainable, ruling that remittance to a Bangalore bank account does not preclude refund eligibility. The petitioner&#039;s claim was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of Unutilized ITC Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Payments Were Remitted to Different Branch&#039;s Bank Account</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86889</link>
      <description>The HC quashed an order denying refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit for FY 2022-23 and Q1 of FY 2023-24. The respondent had rejected the refund claim because payments for exported services by petitioner&#039;s Delhi branch office were remitted to a bank account in Bangalore. Relying on Cable and Wireless Global India Private Limited, the Court held that mapping a Bangalore bank account after receiving remittances validates that services were exported by the Delhi branch office. The Court found the respondent&#039;s objection overly technical and unsustainable, ruling that remittance to a Bangalore bank account does not preclude refund eligibility. The petitioner&#039;s claim was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>