https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767858 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, citing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found no exceptional circumstances, such as a breach of fundamental rights or a violation of natural justice, to justify bypassing this remedy. The petitioner was deemed to have been given adequate opportunities for a personal hearing, negating claims of procedural injustice. The petitioner was granted the liberty to pursue an appeal and raise all grounds initially presented in the writ petition. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767858 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, citing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found no exceptional circumstances, such as a breach of fundamental rights or a violation of natural justice, to justify bypassing this remedy. The petitioner was deemed to have been given adequate opportunities for a personal hearing, negating claims of procedural injustice. The petitioner was granted the liberty to pursue an appeal and raise all grounds initially presented in the writ petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767858