https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767866 The Court rejected the objection to maintainability where the petition was supported by an affidavit of the petitioner's power of attorney holder, holding that the authority to sign and file the petition and affidavit was valid on the facts. It further held that, in an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Enforcement Directorate may summon any necessary person under Section 50, and a non-bailable warrant may issue in aid of investigation where the record shows evasion of process in a non-bailable offence. The petitioner's objections based on foreign residence, service, and absence of personal arraignment were rejected, and the warrant was upheld. en-us Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767866 The Court rejected the objection to maintainability where the petition was supported by an affidavit of the petitioner's power of attorney holder, holding that the authority to sign and file the petition and affidavit was valid on the facts. It further held that, in an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Enforcement Directorate may summon any necessary person under Section 50, and a non-bailable warrant may issue in aid of investigation where the record shows evasion of process in a non-bailable offence. The petitioner's objections based on foreign residence, service, and absence of personal arraignment were rejected, and the warrant was upheld. Case-Laws Money Laundering Sat, 22 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767866