<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1253 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767867</link>
    <description>Homebuyers who paid consideration directly to Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. were found entitled to possession of the completed Phase-I flats in the Greenopolis Project, because those units were treated as Orris&#039;s property and not assets of Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Objections based on the CIRP of Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd. were rejected, as earlier Supreme Court and NCLT directions had recognised that Three C Shelters had no right, title or interest in the project and could not control disposal of those flats. Claimants who paid TCSPL were directed to pursue remedies in that CIRP, while attempts to reopen settled issues were held not to defeat handover to Orris&#039;s allottees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1253 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767867</link>
      <description>Homebuyers who paid consideration directly to Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. were found entitled to possession of the completed Phase-I flats in the Greenopolis Project, because those units were treated as Orris&#039;s property and not assets of Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd. Objections based on the CIRP of Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd. were rejected, as earlier Supreme Court and NCLT directions had recognised that Three C Shelters had no right, title or interest in the project and could not control disposal of those flats. Claimants who paid TCSPL were directed to pursue remedies in that CIRP, while attempts to reopen settled issues were held not to defeat handover to Orris&#039;s allottees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>