<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1255 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767869</link>
    <description>Settlement between the parties covering the operational creditor&#039;s dues and another creditor in the committee of creditors rendered further adjudication unnecessary. On that basis, the appeal was disposed of, and the impugned order in the insolvency proceedings could not be sustained. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside because the dispute had been resolved through settlement rather than requiring a merits determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1255 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767869</link>
      <description>Settlement between the parties covering the operational creditor&#039;s dues and another creditor in the committee of creditors rendered further adjudication unnecessary. On that basis, the appeal was disposed of, and the impugned order in the insolvency proceedings could not be sustained. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside because the dispute had been resolved through settlement rather than requiring a merits determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>