<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1256 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767870</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai upheld penalties against a research analyst for multiple regulatory violations. The appellant failed to properly sign and date research reports, maintain records of recommendations, and ensure independence between research activities and other business divisions. The tribunal rejected claims that WhatsApp/Telegram publications don&#039;t constitute public appearances requiring disclosures. Penalties under sections 15A(c), 15EB, and 15HA were upheld for violations including failure to maintain arm&#039;s length relationships between business activities, inadequate disclosures, and providing misleading information with assured returns promises. The tribunal found the violations multiple and repetitive, justifying the imposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1256 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767870</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai upheld penalties against a research analyst for multiple regulatory violations. The appellant failed to properly sign and date research reports, maintain records of recommendations, and ensure independence between research activities and other business divisions. The tribunal rejected claims that WhatsApp/Telegram publications don&#039;t constitute public appearances requiring disclosures. Penalties under sections 15A(c), 15EB, and 15HA were upheld for violations including failure to maintain arm&#039;s length relationships between business activities, inadequate disclosures, and providing misleading information with assured returns promises. The tribunal found the violations multiple and repetitive, justifying the imposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>