<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1263 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767877</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding deduction under section 37 for royalty payments on intellectual property rights and trademark usage. The court found that the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity to present its case before the CIT(A) despite specific requests for video conferencing or physical hearing. The ITAT accepted additional evidence relating to confidential Standard Operating Procedures involving toxic chemicals, noting these documents were critical to the dispute&#039;s resolution. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh examination of whether the claimed payments constitute allowable business deductions under section 37.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1263 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767877</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding deduction under section 37 for royalty payments on intellectual property rights and trademark usage. The court found that the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity to present its case before the CIT(A) despite specific requests for video conferencing or physical hearing. The ITAT accepted additional evidence relating to confidential Standard Operating Procedures involving toxic chemicals, noting these documents were critical to the dispute&#039;s resolution. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh examination of whether the claimed payments constitute allowable business deductions under section 37.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>