<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1264 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767878</link>
    <description>ITAT (JAIPUR-AT) allowed the appeals and set aside the rejection of registration under section 12AB as curable, directing the matter to be decided afresh by the CIT(E) on production of registration under the RPT Act. Because 80G recognition was denied solely for lack of 12AB registration, the tribunal also restored the 80G recognition issue to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. Appeals allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:56:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1264 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767878</link>
      <description>ITAT (JAIPUR-AT) allowed the appeals and set aside the rejection of registration under section 12AB as curable, directing the matter to be decided afresh by the CIT(E) on production of registration under the RPT Act. Because 80G recognition was denied solely for lack of 12AB registration, the tribunal also restored the 80G recognition issue to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. Appeals allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>