<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1265 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767879</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jodhpur set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding an addition under section 153A assessment. The AO had treated long-term capital gain as undisclosed income based solely on information from Investigation Wing, Kolkata. The tribunal held that no addition can be made without incriminating material for assessment years completed before the search date and not abated by the search. The appellant&#039;s ground was allowed, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1265 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767879</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jodhpur set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding an addition under section 153A assessment. The AO had treated long-term capital gain as undisclosed income based solely on information from Investigation Wing, Kolkata. The tribunal held that no addition can be made without incriminating material for assessment years completed before the search date and not abated by the search. The appellant&#039;s ground was allowed, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>