https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767911 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, finding no violation of natural justice principles as the petitioner was given an opportunity to be heard but failed to appear. The Court noted the petitioner did not utilize the available alternative remedy of appeal within the statutory period, rendering the writ petition not maintainable. Consequently, the Court upheld the order by the Deputy Commissioner, State GST, Kanpur, demanding Rs. 1,73,686/-, and found no grounds for interference. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767911 The HC dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226, finding no violation of natural justice principles as the petitioner was given an opportunity to be heard but failed to appear. The Court noted the petitioner did not utilize the available alternative remedy of appeal within the statutory period, rendering the writ petition not maintainable. Consequently, the Court upheld the order by the Deputy Commissioner, State GST, Kanpur, demanding Rs. 1,73,686/-, and found no grounds for interference. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767911