https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767914 Patna HC dismissed a writ application challenging seizure of goods with vehicle due to defective affidavit. The deponent Gopal Yadav lacked proper authorization to represent all petitioners, only claiming to be manager of one petitioner. The affidavit failed to show authorization from all petitioners and didn't declare the deponent had reviewed the writ application statements. These procedural deficiencies rendered the application incompetent under HC rules, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767914 Patna HC dismissed a writ application challenging seizure of goods with vehicle due to defective affidavit. The deponent Gopal Yadav lacked proper authorization to represent all petitioners, only claiming to be manager of one petitioner. The affidavit failed to show authorization from all petitioners and didn't declare the deponent had reviewed the writ application statements. These procedural deficiencies rendered the application incompetent under HC rules, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767914