<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767917</link>
    <description>The SC ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the refund denial based on bank account location was technically unsustainable. It emphasized that the supplier&#039;s location is determined by the registered place of business, not the bank account receiving payment. The court directed reconsideration of the refund claim with statutory interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1303 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767917</link>
      <description>The SC ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the refund denial based on bank account location was technically unsustainable. It emphasized that the supplier&#039;s location is determined by the registered place of business, not the bank account receiving payment. The court directed reconsideration of the refund claim with statutory interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>