https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767930 The HC set aside the impugned orders issued by the 4th and 5th respondents under Section 73 of the KGST Act, which were deemed invalid due to their duplication for the same tax period and subject matter. The case was remitted back to the 4th respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted the liberty to apply for the Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of the KGST Act, with directions for the 3rd respondent to facilitate this process following the 4th respondent's reassessment. The Court provided specific timelines for compliance to ensure expedited resolution. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767930 The HC set aside the impugned orders issued by the 4th and 5th respondents under Section 73 of the KGST Act, which were deemed invalid due to their duplication for the same tax period and subject matter. The case was remitted back to the 4th respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted the liberty to apply for the Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of the KGST Act, with directions for the 3rd respondent to facilitate this process following the 4th respondent's reassessment. The Court provided specific timelines for compliance to ensure expedited resolution. Case-Laws GST Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767930